You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
A Scientometric Review of Powered Micromobility
Copyright policy )A Scientometric Review of Powered Micromobility
s Web of Science database was guided by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) common vocabulary for powered micromobility. Results show a proliferation of research in the field of powered micromobility since 2012, which demonstrates that the growth in research is occurring alongside the increased availability of microvehicles and trips being made using microvehicles. A broad range of research topics including user behaviour, vehicle technology, planning, policy, health and safety were identified with the latter two found to be the most studied areas. Findings suggest many potential benefits of using micromobility and that the field will continue to grow, spurred by the popularity of shared e-scooter schemes. Greater collaboration in the field is desirable to broaden the dissemination of knowledge.
. The recent uptake in powered microvehicles emphasizes the need to understand the knowledge domain of micromobility research. This paper summarises the research status by identifying main contributors to and evolutionary trends in the field. The study applied scientometric analysis techniques to review 474 articles published between 1991 and 2020. The search on Thomson Reuter&rsquo
Micromobility is an emerging field of transportation, referring to trips undertaken by a range of microvehicles. Microvehicles encompass both traditional and emerging types of light vehicles from conventional bicycles and powered-two wheelers, through to e-bikes and e-scooters, e-skateboards and &ldquo
hoverboards&rdquo
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Computer science Data science Field (computer science)
powered-two wheelers, Environmental effects of industries and plants, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, e-bikes, Geography, Planning and Development, TJ807-830, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, Environmental sciences, scientometric analysis, micromobility, GE1-350, e-scooters
powered-two wheelers, Environmental effects of industries and plants, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, e-bikes, Geography, Planning and Development, TJ807-830, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, Environmental sciences, scientometric analysis, micromobility, GE1-350, e-scooters
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Computer science Data science Field (computer science)
7017
1. 2. Santacreu, A.; Yannis, G.; de Saint Leon, O.; CRIST, P. “Safe micromobility.”, OECD/ITF. 2020. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/1696177 (accessed on 18 October 2020). SAE International. J3163 Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Shared Mobility and Enabling Technologies; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018. NACTO. Shared Micromobility in the US: 2018; NACTO: New York, NY, USA, 2019. Lazarus, J.; Pourquier, J.C.; Feng, F.; Hammel, H.; Shaheen, S.A. Micromobility Evolution and Expansion: Understanding How Docked and Dockless Bikesharing Models Complement and Compete-A Case Study of San Francisco. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 84, 102620. [CrossRef]
Guidon, S.; Wicki, M.; Bernauer, T.; Axhausen, K. Transportation Service Bundling-For Whose Benefit? Consumer Valuation of Pure Bundling in the Passenger Transportation Market. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pr. 2020, 131, 91-106. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]
Shi rin, R.M.; Borner, K. Mapping Knowledge Domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5183-5185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, C.; Song, M. Visualizing a Field of Research: A Methodology of Systematic Scientometric Reviews. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ogilvie, D.; Egan, M.; Hamilton, V.; Petticrew, M. Promoting Walking and Cycling As an Alternative to Using Cars: Systematic Review. BMJ 2004, 329, 763. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]
Oja, P.; Titze, S.; Bauman, A.; De Geus, B.; Krenn, P.; Reger-Nash, B.; Kohlberger, T. Health Benefits of Cycling: A Systematic Review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2011, 21, 496-509. [CrossRef]
10. Olivier, J.; Creighton, P. Bicycle Injuries and Helmet Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 372. [CrossRef]
11. Solero, L. Nonconventional On-Board Charger for Electric Vehicle Propulsion Batteries. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2001, 50, 144-149. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]
12. Molinillo, S.; Ruiz-Montañez, M.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F.J. User Characteristics Influencing Use of a Bicycle-Sharing System Integrated into an Intermodal Transport Network in Spain. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2019, 14, 513-524. [CrossRef]
13. Younes, H.; Zou, Z.; Wu, J.; Baiocchi, G. Comparing the Temporal Determinants of Dockless Scooter-Share and Station-Based Bike-Share in Washington, D.C. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pr. 2020, 134, 308-320. [CrossRef]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).33 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).33 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!s Web of Science database was guided by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) common vocabulary for powered micromobility. Results show a proliferation of research in the field of powered micromobility since 2012, which demonstrates that the growth in research is occurring alongside the increased availability of microvehicles and trips being made using microvehicles. A broad range of research topics including user behaviour, vehicle technology, planning, policy, health and safety were identified with the latter two found to be the most studied areas. Findings suggest many potential benefits of using micromobility and that the field will continue to grow, spurred by the popularity of shared e-scooter schemes. Greater collaboration in the field is desirable to broaden the dissemination of knowledge.
. The recent uptake in powered microvehicles emphasizes the need to understand the knowledge domain of micromobility research. This paper summarises the research status by identifying main contributors to and evolutionary trends in the field. The study applied scientometric analysis techniques to review 474 articles published between 1991 and 2020. The search on Thomson Reuter&rsquo
Micromobility is an emerging field of transportation, referring to trips undertaken by a range of microvehicles. Microvehicles encompass both traditional and emerging types of light vehicles from conventional bicycles and powered-two wheelers, through to e-bikes and e-scooters, e-skateboards and &ldquo
hoverboards&rdquo