You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A cobertura da Covid-19 no Rio de Janeiro: aspectos da rotina produtiva do Telejornalismo Local.
A cobertura da Covid-19 no Rio de Janeiro: aspectos da rotina produtiva do Telejornalismo Local.
O telejornal brasileiro passou por uma série de mudanças diante dos desafios da cobertura durante a pandemia Covid-19, com alteração das rotinas produtivas, demanda por novos papéis e competências profissionais e novas produções de sentido nas telas. Mudanças na anatomia do telejornal (Piccinin & Soster, 2012) marcam fases, que também incluem a construção narrativa que vinha sendo feita sobre a própria pandemia em todos os momentos. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar uma análise da cobertura da pandemia em 18 edições dos telejornais RJ1 e RJ2, veiculados no estado do Rio pela Rede Globo. A metodologia adotada foi a de estudo de caso (Yin, 2011), nos primeiros nove meses de cobertura da Covid-19, tendo como referencial teórico as fases do telejornal brasileiro detectadas por Silva (2018). Buscamos aqui identificar novas estratégias narrativas (Thomé & Reis, 2019a), observando características de fases anteriores que foram retomadas e/ou ressignificadas, e também como a pandemia alterou rotinas produtivas e gerou novas produções de sentido nas telas. Fontes de informação com microfone em mãos, imagens enviados por aplicativos, repórteres com máscaras em coberturas externas, imagens de arquivo ressignificadas e predomínio de contribuições de repórteres "ao vivo". As mudanças na anatomia do telejornal (Piccinin & Soster, 2012) passaram por fases, que incluem também a construção narrativa que se fazia sobre a pandemia em cada momento da cobertura televisiva analisada.
Brazilian newscasts have experienced a series of changes in face of the challenges of Covid-19 coverage, with changes in production routines, demand for new functions and skills, and new productions of meaning on screens. The change in the anatomy of the newscast (Piccinin & Soster, 2012) went through phases, which also include the narrative construction that was being made about the pandemic itself at all times. The purpose of this article is to present an analysis of the pandemic coverage in 18 editions of the RJ1 and RJ2 newscasts, broadcast by Rede Globo in Rio de Janeiro. The method that was used is the Case Study (Yin, 2011), aplied in the first nine months of Covid19 coverage, using as theorical reference the phases of Brazilian television news programs detected by Silva (2018). The aim is to identify the new narrative strategies (Thomé & Reis, 2019a), observing what characteristics of previous phases were retaken and / or reformulated, and also how the pandemic changed productive routines and generated new productions of meaning on the screens. Sources holding microphone, sounds sent by applications, reporters with masks, resignified archive images and predominance of live broadcast - the change in the anatomy of the newscast (Piccinin & Soster, 2012) went through phases, which also included the narrative of construction being done on the pandemic itself at each time of newscast coverage that was analiysed.
Telejournalism, Rio de Janeiro, General Medicine, Novas rotinas, Adaptation, New routines, Covid-19, Telejornalismo, Adaptação
Telejournalism, Rio de Janeiro, General Medicine, Novas rotinas, Adaptation, New routines, Covid-19, Telejornalismo, Adaptação
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!