You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Patient perspective on telemedicine replacing physical consultations in urology during the COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark
Copyright policy )Objective: In March-April 2020, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown in Denmark, the Danish Health Authorities recommended that, where possible, face-to-face patient-physician consultations be replaced by telephone consultations. The aim of this study was to obtain patients’ evaluation of their telemedicine experience. Methods: Patients who were candidates for telemedicine consultations were recruited based on their urological ailment, necessity for follow-up and comorbidity. New referrals including patients with suspicion of cancer were not candidates for telemedicine. In total, 548 patients had their appointment altered during the period from 13 March to 30 April 2020. Postal questionnaires were sent to 548 patients and 300 (54.7%) replied. Results: In total, 280 patient answered, 224 (80%) men and 56 (20%) women, mean age 69 years (range 18–91) of whom 180 (64.3%) had a benign and 100 (35.7%) a malignant diagnosis. Twenty (6.7%) respondents did not remember their telephone consultation and were therefore excluded. Telephone consultation satisfaction was reported by 230 (85.0%) patients, but they would not prefer video consultations over telephone consultations, and only 102 (36.4%) would prefer telephone consultations in the future. Patients’ age, sex and distance to the hospital did not seem to be associated with telephone consultation satisfaction (age p = 0.17; sex p = 0.99; distance p = 0.27, respectively). In total, 226 (80.7%) were medically assessed as being at risk for COVID, but 74 (26.4%) subjectively evaluated themselves as being at risk. Conclusions: In general (85.0%), urological patients were satisfied with telephone consultations.
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Urologic disease medicine.disease medicine Complication Outpatient clinic Bleomycin chemistry.chemical_compound chemistry Clinical trial Carcinoma Young adult Objective Improvement Internal medicine medicine.medical_specialty business.industry business
Urology, Nephrology, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, COVID-19, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Patient Preference, SARS-CoV-2, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Telephone, Urologic Diseases, Videoconferencing, Young Adult, consultations, Covid-19, outpatient clinic, questionnaire
Urology, Nephrology, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, COVID-19, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Patient Preference, SARS-CoV-2, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Telephone, Urologic Diseases, Videoconferencing, Young Adult, consultations, Covid-19, outpatient clinic, questionnaire
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Urologic disease medicine.disease medicine Complication Outpatient clinic Bleomycin chemistry.chemical_compound chemistry Clinical trial Carcinoma Young adult Objective Improvement Internal medicine medicine.medical_specialty business.industry business
- Odense University Hospital Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark Denmark
- Odense University Hospital Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark Denmark
Objective: In March-April 2020, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown in Denmark, the Danish Health Authorities recommended that, where possible, face-to-face patient-physician consultations be replaced by telephone consultations. The aim of this study was to obtain patients’ evaluation of their telemedicine experience. Methods: Patients who were candidates for telemedicine consultations were recruited based on their urological ailment, necessity for follow-up and comorbidity. New referrals including patients with suspicion of cancer were not candidates for telemedicine. In total, 548 patients had their appointment altered during the period from 13 March to 30 April 2020. Postal questionnaires were sent to 548 patients and 300 (54.7%) replied. Results: In total, 280 patient answered, 224 (80%) men and 56 (20%) women, mean age 69 years (range 18–91) of whom 180 (64.3%) had a benign and 100 (35.7%) a malignant diagnosis. Twenty (6.7%) respondents did not remember their telephone consultation and were therefore excluded. Telephone consultation satisfaction was reported by 230 (85.0%) patients, but they would not prefer video consultations over telephone consultations, and only 102 (36.4%) would prefer telephone consultations in the future. Patients’ age, sex and distance to the hospital did not seem to be associated with telephone consultation satisfaction (age p = 0.17; sex p = 0.99; distance p = 0.27, respectively). In total, 226 (80.7%) were medically assessed as being at risk for COVID, but 74 (26.4%) subjectively evaluated themselves as being at risk. Conclusions: In general (85.0%), urological patients were satisfied with telephone consultations.