You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Evolution of outcomes for patients hospitalized during the first SARS-CoV-2 pandemic wave in France
Evolution of outcomes for patients hospitalized during the first SARS-CoV-2 pandemic wave in France
As SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread, a thorough characterization of healthcare needs and patient outcomes is essential to inform planning; however, these analyses are complicated by ongoing changes in patient profiles. Here we develop age and sex adjusted models to analyze detailed patient trajectories from 91,304 hospitalizations in France during the first 4 months of the epidemic. Only 25% of hospital deaths occurred in patients that were admitted into ICU. The probability of entering ICU fell by 50% and the probability of death by 52% over the study period. Had the age and sex profile not changed over time, these reductions would have been 59% and 56%, respectively. These findings suggest substantial improvements in patient outcomes since the start of the pandemic.
- Université Paris Diderot France
- Inserm France
- UNIVERSITE PARIS DESCARTES France
- Institut Pasteur France
SARS-CoV-2, delays, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, ICU, outcome, COVID-19, epidemiology, [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, hospital
SARS-CoV-2, delays, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, ICU, outcome, COVID-19, epidemiology, [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, hospital
20 references, page 1 of 2
1. T. Singhal, A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J. Pediatr. 87, 281-286 (2020).
2. RECOVERY Collaborative Group, P. Horby, W. S. Lim, J. R. Emberson, M. Mafham, J. L. Bell, L. Linsell, N. Staplin, C. Brightling, A. Ustianowski, E. Elmahi, B. Prudon, C. Green, T. Felton, D. Chadwick, K. Rege, C. Fegan, L. C. Chappell, S. N. Faust, T. Jaki, K. Jeffery, A. Montgomery, K. Rowan, E. Juszczak, J. K. Baillie, R. Haynes, M. J. Landray, Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 - Preliminary Report. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020), doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436.
3. R. Verity, L. C. Okell, I. Dorigatti, P. Winskill, C. Whittaker, N. Imai, G. CuomoDannenburg, H. Thompson, P. G. T. Walker, H. Fu, A. Dighe, J. T. Griffin, M. Baguelin, S. Bhatia, A. Boonyasiri, A. Cori, Z. Cucunubá, R. FitzJohn, K. Gaythorpe, W. Green, A. Hamlet, W. Hinsley, D. Laydon, G. Nedjati-Gilani, S. Riley, S. van Elsland, E. Volz, H. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Xi, C. A. Donnelly, A. C. Ghani, N. M. Ferguson, Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 669-677 (2020).
4. P. N. Perez Guzman, A. Daunt, S. Mukherjee, P. Crook, R. Forlano, M. Kont, A. Lochen, M. Vollmer, P. Middleton, R. Judge, Others, Report 17: Clinical characteristics and predictors of outcomes of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in a London NHS Trust: a retrospective cohort study, doi:10.25561/78613.
5. S. Richardson, J. S. Hirsch, M. Narasimhan, J. M. Crawford, T. McGinn, K. W. Davidson, and the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium, D. P. Barnaby, L. B. Becker, J. D. Chelico, S. L. Cohen, J. Cookingham, K. Coppa, M. A. Diefenbach, A. J. Dominello, J. Duer-Hefele, L. Falzon, J. Gitlin, N. Hajizadeh, T. G. Harvin, D. A. Hirschwerk, E. J. Kim, Z. M. Kozel, L. M. Marrast, J. N. Mogavero, G. A. Osorio, M. Qiu, T. P. Zanos, Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA (2020), doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
6. J. A. Lewnard, V. X. Liu, M. L. Jackson, M. A. Schmidt, B. L. Jewell, J. P. Flores, C. Jentz, G. R. Northrup, A. Mahmud, A. L. Reingold, M. Petersen, N. P. Jewell, S. Young, J. Bellows, Incidence, clinical outcomes, and transmission dynamics of severe coronavirus disease 2019 in California and Washington: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 369, m1923 (2020).
7. C. M. Petrilli, S. A. Jones, J. Yang, H. Rajagopalan, L. O'Donnell, Y. Chernyak, K. A. Tobin, R. J. Cerfolio, F. Francois, L. I. Horwitz, Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 369, m1966 (2020).
8. C. Faes, S. Abrams, D. Van Beckhoven, G. Meyfroidt, E. Vlieghe, N. Hens, Time between Symptom Onset, Hospitalisation and Recovery or Death: a Statistical Analysis of Different Time-Delay Distributions in Belgian COVID-19 Patients. Epidemiology (2020), , doi:10.1101/2020.07.18.20156307.
9. H. Salje, C. Tran Kiem, N. Lefrancq, N. Courtejoie, P. Bosetti, J. Paireau, A. Andronico, N. Hozé, J. Richet, C.-L. Dubost, Y. Le Strat, J. Lessler, D. Levy-Bruhl, A. Fontanet, L. Opatowski, P.-Y. Boelle, S. Cauchemez, Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France. Science. 369, 208-211 (2020).
10. S. Joebges, N. Biller-Andorno, Ethics guidelines on COVID-19 triage-an emerging
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!