• COVID-19
• Publicationsclose
• Research dataclose
• Other research productsclose
• 2013-2022close
• Open Access close
• DE close
• IE close
• LK close
• COVID-19 close

AbstractBats are known to be reservoirs of several highly pathogenic viruses. Hence, the interest in bat virus discovery has been increasing rapidly over the last decade. So far, most studies have focused on a single type of virus detection method, either PCR, virus isolation or virome sequencing. Here we present a comprehensive approach in virus discovery, using all three discovery methods on samples from the same bats. By family-specific PCR screening we found sequences of paramyxoviruses, adenoviruses, herpesviruses and one coronavirus. By cell culture we isolated a novel bat adenovirus and bat orthoreovirus. Virome sequencing revealed viral sequences of ten different virus families and orders: three bat nairoviruses, three phenuiviruses, one orbivirus, one rotavirus, one orthoreovirus, one mononegavirus, five parvoviruses, seven picornaviruses, three retroviruses, one totivirus and two thymoviruses were discovered. Of all viruses identified by family-specific PCR in the original samples, none was found by metagenomic sequencing. Vice versa, none of the viruses found by the metagenomic virome approach was detected by family-specific PCRs targeting the same family. The discrepancy of detected viruses by different detection approaches suggests that a combined approach using different detection methods is necessary for virus discovery studies.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2, a new member of the genus Betacoronavirus, is a pandemic virus, which has caused numerous fatalities, particularly in the elderly and persons with underlying morbidities. At present, there are no approved vaccines nor antiviral therapies available. The detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies plays a crucial role in the assessment of the immune status of convalescent COVID-19 patients, evaluation of recombinant therapeutic antibodies, and the evaluation of novel vaccines. To detect SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies, classically, a virus-neutralization test has to be performed at biosafety level 3, considerably limiting the general use of this test. In the present work, a biosafety level 1 pseudotype virus assay based on a propagation-incompetent vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has been used to determine the neutralizing antibody titers in convalescent COVID-19 patients. The neutralization titers in serum of two independently analyzed patient cohorts were available within 18 h and correlated well with those obtained with a classical SARS-CoV-2 neutralization test (Pearson correlation coefficients of r = 0.929 and r = 0.939, respectively). Most convalescent COVID-19 patients had only low titers of neutralizing antibodies (ND50 < 320). The sera of convalescent COVID-19 patients also neutralized pseudotype virus displaying the SARS-CoV-1 spike protein on their surface, which is homologous to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. In summary, we report a robust virus-neutralization assay, which can be used at low biosafety level 1 to rapidly quantify SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies in convalescent COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals.

A novel series of bis- (Abdelhamid et al., 2017, Banerjee et al., 2018, Bharanidharan et al., 2022)thiadiazoles was synthesized from the reaction of precursor dimethyl 2,2′-(1,2-diphenylethane-1,2-diylidene)-bis(hydrazine-1-carbodithioate) and hydrazonyl chlorides in ethanol under ultrasonic irradiation. Spectral tools (IR. NMR, MS, elemental analyses, molecular dynamic simulation, DFT and LUMO and HOMO) were used to elucidate the structure of the isolated products. Molecular docking for the precursor, 3 and ligands 6a-i to two COVID-19 important proteins M$^{pro}$ and RdRp was compared with two approved drugs, Remdesivir and Ivermectin. The binding affinity varied between the ligands and the drugs. The highest recorded binding affinity of 6c with M$^{pro}$ was (−9.2 kcal/mol), followed by 6b and 6a, (−8.9 and −8.5 kcal/mol), respectively. The lowest recorded binding affinity was (−7.0 kcal/mol) for 6 g. In comparison, the approved drugs showed binding affinity (−7.4 and −7.7 kcal/mol), for Remdesivir and Ivermectin, respectively, which are within the range of the binding affinity of our ligands. The binding affinity of the approved drug Ivermectin against RdRp recoded the highest (−8.6 kcal/mol), followed by 6a, 6 h, and 6i are the same have (−8.2 kcal/mol). The lowest reading was found for compound 3 ligand (−6.3 kcal/mol). On the other side, the amino acids also differed between the compounds studied in this project for both the viral proteins. The ligand 6a forms three H-bonds with Thr 319(A), Sr 255(A) and Arg 457(A), whereas Ivermectin forms three H-bonds with His 41(A), Gly143(A) and Gln 18(A) for viral M$^{pro}$. The RdRp amino acids residues could be divided into four groups based on the amino acids that interact with hydrogen or hydrophobic interactions. The first group contained 6d, 6b, 6 g, and Remdesivir with 1–4 hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions 1 to 10. Group 2 is 6a and 6f exhibited 1 and 3 hydrogen bonds and 15 and 14 hydrophobic interactions. Group 3 has 6e and Ivermectin shows 4 and 3 hydrogen bonds, respectively and 11 hydrophobic interactions for both compounds. The last group contains ligands 3, 6c, 6 h, and 6i gave 1–3 hydrogen bonds and 6c and 3 recorded the highest number of hydrophobic interactions, 14 for both 6c and 6 h. Pro Tox-II estimated compounds’ activities as Hepatoxic, Carcinogenic and Mutagenic, revealing that 6f-h were inactive in all five similar to that found with Remdesivir and Ivermectin. The drug-likeness prediction was carried out by studying physicochemical properties, lipophilicity, size, polarity, insolubility, unsaturation, and flexibility. Generally, some properties of the ligands were comparable to that of the standards used in this study, Remdesivir and Ivermectin.

Abstract Background Experiences from the first wave of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic can aide in the development of future preventive strategies. To date, risk prediction models for COVID-19-related incidence and outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) patients are missing. Methods We developed risk prediction models for COVID-19 incidence and mortality among HD patients. We studied 38 256 HD patients from a multi-national dialysis cohort between March 3rd and July 3rd 2020. Risk prediction models were developed and validated, based on predictors readily available in outpatient haemodialysis units. We compared mortality among patients with and without COVID-19, matched for age, sex, and diabetes. Results During the observational period, 1 259 patients (3.3%) acquired COVID-19. Of these, 62% were hospitalised or died. Mortality was 22% among COVID-19 patients with odds ratios 219.8 (95% CI 80.6-359) to 342.7 (95% CI 60.6-13595.1), compared to matched patients without COVID-19. Since the first wave of the pandemic affected mostly European countries during the study, the risk prediction model for incidence of COVID-19 was developed and validated in European patients only (N = 22 826, AUCDev 0.64, AUCVal 0.69). The model for prediction of mortality was developed in all COVID-19 patients (AUCDev 0.71, AUCVal 0.78). Angiotensin receptor blockers were independently associated with a lower incidence of COVID-19 in European patients. Conclusions We identified modifiable risk factors for COVID-19 incidence and outcome in HD patients. Our risk prediction tools can be readily applied in clinical practice. The current study can aid in the development of preventive strategies for future waves of COVID-19. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

STRUCTURED ABSTRACTHyperinflammation is frequently observed in patients with severe COVID-19. Inadequate and defective IFN type I responses against SARS-CoV-2, associated with autoantibodies in a proportion of patients, lead to severe courses of disease. In addition, hyperactive responses of the humoral immune system have been described.In the current study we investigated a possible role of neutralizing autoantibodies against antiinflammatory mediators. Plasma from adult patients with severe and critical COVID-19 was screened by ELISA for antibodies against PGRN, IL-1-Ra, IL-10, IL-18BP, IL-22BP, IL-36-Ra, CD40, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, IFN-ω and serpinB1. Autoantibodies were characterized and the antigens were analyzed for immunogenic alterations.In a discovery cohort with severe to critical COVID-19 high titers of PGRN-autoantibodies were detected in 11 of 30 (36.7%), and of IL-1-Ra-autoantibodies in 14 of 30 (46.7%) patients. In a validation cohort of 64 patients with critical COVID-19 high-titer PGRN-Abs were detected in 25 (39%) and IL-1-Ra-Abs in 32 of 64 patients (50%). PGRN-Abs and IL-1-Ra-Abs belonged to IgM and several IgG subclasses. In separate cohorts with non-critical COVID-19, PGRN-Abs and IL-1-Ra-Abs were detected in low frequency (i.e. in < 5% of patients) and at low titers. Neither PGRN-nor IL-1-Ra-Abs were found in 40 healthy controls vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 or 188 unvaccinated healthy controls. PGRN-Abs were not cross-reactive against SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins nor against IL-1-Ra. Plasma levels of both free PGRN and free IL-1-Ra were significantly decreased in autoantibody-positive patients compared to Ab-negative and non-COVID-19 controls. In vitro PGRN-Abs from patients functionally reduced PGRN-dependent inhibition of TNF-α signaling, and IL-1-Ra-Abs from patients reduced IL-1-Ra- or anakinra-dependent inhibition of IL-1ß signaling. The pSer81 hyperphosphorylated PGRN isoform was exclusively detected in patients with high-titer PGRN-Abs; likewise, a hyperphosphorylated IL-1-Ra isoform was only found in patients with high-titer IL-1-Ra-Abs. Thr111 was identified as the hyperphophorylated amino acid of IL-1-Ra. In longitudinally collected samples hyperphosphorylated isoforms of both PGRN and IL-1-Ra emerged transiently, and preceded the appearance of autoantibodies. In hospitalized patients, the presence of IL-1-Ra-Abs or IL-1-Ra-Abs in combination with PGRN-Abs was associated with a higher morbidity and mortality.To conclude, neutralizing autoantibodies to IL-1-Ra and PGRN occur in a significant portion of patients with critical COVID-19, with a concomitant decrease in circulating free PGRN and IL-1-Ra, indicative of a misdirected, proinflammatory autoimmune response. The break of self-tolerance is likely caused by atypical hyperphosphorylated isoforms of both antigens, whose appearances precede autoantibody induction. Our data suggest that these immunogenic secondary modifications are induced by the SARS-CoV-2-infection itself or the inflammatory environment evoked by the infection and predispose for a critical course of COVID-19.

Follow-Up-Befragung zur Studie „Homeoffice- und Präsenzkultur im Bereich IT und technische Dienstleistungen in Zeiten der Covid-19-Pandemie“: Durch die Ausbreitung des Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 und die damit verbundenen Schutzmaßnahmen sind für viele Beschäftigte aus dem Bereich IT und technische Dienstleistungen eine Reihe von Veränderungen im Arbeits- und Privatleben entstanden. Ein Jahr später ist die Homeoffice-Situation für einige Beschäftigte – nicht zuletzt auch durch die Corona-Arbeitsschutzverordnung weiter verstärkt – zum Alltag geworden. Es stellt sich die Frage, wie die Beschäftigten mit ihrer neuen Arbeitssituation umgehen. Die vorliegende Studie zielt darauf ab, die Veränderung der Homeoffice- und Präsenzkultur in Zeiten der Covid-19-Pandemie im Bereich IT und technische Dienstleistungen zu untersuchen. Zudem sollen die wahrgenommenen Veränderungen nach einem Jahr Homeoffice ermittelt sowie der Zusammenhang zwischen Homeoffice- und Präsenzkultur und der mentalen Gesundheit von Beschäftigten untersucht werden. Aufbauend auf einer Online-Umfrage aus April 2020 mit 1.933 Beschäftigten aus dem Bereich IT und technische Dienstleistungen führte das IMVR eine Folgebefragung im Mai 2021 durch. Zum zweiten Befragungszeitpunkt haben 236 Beschäftigte erneut an der Befragung teilgenommen. Die Ergebnisse der zweiten Befragung zeigen, dass die Präsenzkultur nach einem Jahr Homeoffice signifikant abgenommen hat und die Homeofficekultur signifikant gestiegen ist. Zudem werden Empfehlungen für eine gesundheitsförderliche Arbeitsgestaltung im Homeoffice häufiger eingehalten. Wahrgenommene Veränderungen der Arbeitssituation nach einem Jahr im Homeoffice beziehen sich vor allem auf den Kontakt und die Zusammenarbeit, die Akzeptanz von Homeoffice sowie den erhöhten Arbeitsaufwand und Flexibilität im Homeoffice. Des Weiteren zeigt sich ein Zusammenhang zwischen der Homeoffice- bzw. Präsenzkultur und der Gesundheit von Beschäftigten.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has affected human mobility via lockdowns, social distancing rules, home quarantines, and the full or partial suspension of transportation. Evidence-based policy recommendations are urgently needed to ensure that transport systems have resilience to future pandemic outbreaks, particularly within Global South megacities where demand for public transport is high and reduced access can exacerbate socio-economic inequalities. This study focuses on Metro Manila – a characteristic megacity that experienced one of the most stringent lockdowns worldwide. It analyzes aggregated cell phone and GPS data from Google and Apple that provide a comprehensive representation of mobility behavior before and during the lockdown. While significant decreases are observed for all transport modes, public transport experienced the largest drop (−74.5 %, on average). The study demonstrates that: (i) those most reliant on public transport were disproportionately affected by lockdowns; (ii) public transport was unable to fulfil its role as public service; and, (iii) this drove a paradigm shift towards active mobility. Moving forwards, in the short-term policymakers must promote active mobility and prioritize public transport to reduce unequal access to transport. Longer-term, policymakers must leverage the increased active transport to encourage modal shift via infrastructure investment, and better utilize big data to support decision-making.

Background: In a situation of compulsory home isolation enacted by governments at the spreading of the Covid-19 pandemic, the emotional health and well-being of students became a key factor in the successful implementation of distance teaching methodologies in face-to-face education universities. Psychological well-being, an essential factor in preventing academic failure, has been threatened in this serious situation of unprecedented and stressful isolation. The aim of this study is to analyze the students’ cognitive-emotional regulation as well as their beliefs and perceptions about the pandemic and this lockdown situation. With this extensive study we are carrying out, want to describe the extent to which the lockdown situation is a risk factor, and, in the future, make proposals for preventive and palliative actions, if necessary, to minimize this potential risk. Method: We applied the CERQ Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire by means of an online application together with a questionnaire, CC/covid-19, of objective description and subjective perception of the lockdown situation of the students, their conditions to study, general opinions about the pandemic and specific opinions about the real possibilities of implementing online education in the middle of the academic year at the university. 1910 valid responses from more than 80 universities in 13 different Spanish-speaking countries were obtained and submitted to descriptive analysis and modeling using structural equations. Results: Most of them consider that the lockdown decision is correct, that health systems are not prepared to deal with the pandemic, and that although the universities have adequate means, the teaching staff is not competent to implement online teaching methodologies. They have a good perception of the conditions of isolation, however, the time devoted to studying has not increased. One of the results of our study is the students’ self-evaluation about their digital competence and their capacity to perform in online interactive communication. This is key to rejecting a feeling of loneliness or social isolation, even if there is momentary physical separation with friends and classmates which is consistent with the results of emotional well-being the surveyed students present. The cognitive strategies used by the students surveyed have allowed them coping with events arising from the pandemic, mandatory isolation and university closure, certainly adaptive and functional, while maintaining a positive perception of their new living and learning situation. FEDER/Junta de AndaluciaConsejeria de Economia y Conocimiento/Proyecto B-SEJ-516-UGR18

Im Tagesreport werden täglich aktuelle Kennzahlen aus dem DIVI-Intensivregister (www.intensivregister.de) berichtet. Es werden die aktuell gemeldeten Anzahlen der COVID-19 Intensivfälle sowie die gemeldeten intensivmedizinischen Behandlungskapazitäten angezeigt. Der Tagesreport liefert dabei ausschließlich einen Blick auf die Daten gemäß dem Stand des betrachteten Tages. Die Daten sind im situationsbedingten Kontext aufbereitet, damit sind verschiedene Tagesreports u.U. nicht direkt miteinander vergleichbar. Die aktuellsten Meldungen werden im gewählten Betrachtungszeitfenster über alle Meldebereiche und Standorte aufsummiert. Weitere Informationen sind zu finden unter https://www.intensivregister.de/#/faq

Im Tagesreport werden täglich aktuelle Kennzahlen aus dem DIVI-Intensivregister (www.intensivregister.de) berichtet. Es werden die aktuell gemeldeten Anzahlen der COVID-19 Intensivfälle sowie die gemeldeten intensivmedizinischen Behandlungskapazitäten angezeigt. Der Tagesreport liefert dabei ausschließlich einen Blick auf die Daten gemäß dem Stand des betrachteten Tages. Die Daten sind im situationsbedingten Kontext aufbereitet, damit sind verschiedene Tagesreports u.U. nicht direkt miteinander vergleichbar. Die aktuellsten Meldungen werden im gewählten Betrachtungszeitfenster über alle Meldebereiche und Standorte aufsummiert. Weitere Informationen sind zu finden unter https://www.intensivregister.de/#/faq